In World War II, Hollywood produced films that “created a communal viewing experience unlike any during World War I” intended to maintain resolve for the war. Nowhere has the use of propaganda been more ubiquitous than in war, especially because acquiescence or resistance is based on public sentiment and behavior. This included the use of symbols and slogans that were memorable, such that they could frame “ pictures”-or, cognitive shortcuts-that the public recalled when engaging elected officials to shape certain policies. Scaling to the mass-level, however, required simplicity. Second, that those public attitudes could also be manipulated. One is that the mass public played a key role in political outcomes, such as success and failure in war. In 1927, the political scientist Harold Lasswell wrote about political propaganda as “the management of collective attitudes by the manipulation of significant symbols.” Underlying Lasswell’s work were two sets of insights.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |